Pimelea microcephala
species of plant
Pimelea microcephala, commonly known as mallee rice-flower or shrubby rice-flower is a species of flowering plant in the family Thymelaeaceae and is endemic to mainland Australia. It is an erect shrub with compact heads of male or female, white to yellow or greenish flowers on separate plants, the heads surrounded by 2 or 4 leaf-like involucral bracts.
Description
Pimelea microcephala is an erect, dioecious shrub that typically grows to a height of 0.7–4 m (2 ft 4 in – 13 ft 1 in) and has glabrous stems. Its leaves are arranged in opposite pairs, linear to more or less narrowly elliptic, mostly 7–40 mm (0.28–1.57 in) long and 1–4 mm (0.039–0.157 in) wide on a short petiole. The flowers are white to yellow or greenish and arranged on the ends of branches in compact heads on a peduncle 2–13 mm (0.079–0.512 in) long. The flowers are glabrous inside and usually densely curly-hairy on the outside, on a hairy pedicel. Male flowers are in heads of 8 to 100 flowers, the floral tube 3–7 mm (0.12–0.28 in) long. Female flowers are in heads of 7 to 12, each 2–4 mm (0.079–0.157 in) long. The sepals are 0.2–2 mm (0.0079–0.0787 in) long and the stamens of male flowers are shorter than the sepals. Flowering mainly occurs from April to September and the fruit is a succulent, red nut.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Pimelea microcephala” is species of plant. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Pimelea, microcephala and species, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “species of plant” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 7, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q7194615. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pimelea microcephala”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pimelea microcephala primary sources, Pimelea microcephala archive and Pimelea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pimelea microcephala”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pimelea microcephala” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.