CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Baltimore classification

virus classification system by David Baltimore consisting of 7 groups based on genome type (DNA or RNA), number of strands (single- or double-stranded), sense (positive or negative), and method of replication (through DNA or RNA intermediate)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ782725
Source-derived summary

Baltimore classification is a system used to classify viruses by their routes of transferring genetic information from the genome to messenger RNA (mRNA). Seven Baltimore groups, or classes, exist and are designated by the Roman numerals I to VII. Groups are defined by whether the viral genome is composed of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or ribonucleic acid (RNA); whether the genome is single- or double-stranded; and whether the virus makes DNA from RNA (reverse transcription (RT)). Viruses with single-stranded genomes are further differentiated by whether these genomes are positive-sense (+) or negative-sense (–). Viruses within each of the Baltimore groups typically share a common replication method. Additional characteristics, such as virion structure, are not directly related to Baltimore classification and may not be shared by viruses within each group.

The seven Baltimore groups are for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) viruses, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses, positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) viruses, negative-sense single-stranded RNA (–ssRNA) viruses, ssRNA viruses that have a DNA intermediate in their life cycle (ssRNA-RT), and dsDNA viruses that have an RNA intermediate in their life cycle (dsDNA-RT). Only one class exists for ssDNA viruses because their genomes are converted to dsDNA before transcription regardless of sense. Some viruses belong to more than one Baltimore group, such as DNA viruses that have either dsDNA or ssDNA as their genome.

Many virus characteristics do not define which Baltimore group they belong to but do correlate to specific Baltimore groups. This includes the use of RNA editing and alternative splicing, whether the virus's genome is segmented, the size and structure of the virus's genome, the host range of viruses, whether the virus packages replication and transcription machinery into virions, and unorthodox methods of translating mRNA into proteins.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Baltimore classification” as virus classification system by David Baltimore consisting of 7 groups based on genome type (DNA or RNA), number of strands (single- or double-stranded), sense (positive or negative), and method of replication (through DNA or RNA intermediate). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 288-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Baltimore, classification and virus can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as virus classification system by David Baltimore consisting of 7 groups based on genome type (DNA or RNA), number of strands (single- or double-stranded), sense (positive or negative), and method of replication (through DNA or RNA intermediate). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q782725. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Baltimore classification”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Baltimore classification primary sources, Baltimore classification archive and Baltimore research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Baltimore classification”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Baltimore classification” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.