CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Baktalórántháza VSE

association football club in Hungary

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ568519 ↗
Source-derived summary

Baktalórántháza VSE is a Hungarian football club located in Baktalórántháza, Hungary. The team's colors are white and blue. It currently plays in Megyei Bajnokság II – Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, the fifth tier of Hungarian football.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Baktalórántháza VSE” is association football club in Hungary. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Baktalórántháza, association and football, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current 33-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1916. For this dossier, Baktalórántháza, association and football is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “association football club in Hungary” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q568519. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Baktalórántháza VSE”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Baktalórántháza VSE primary sources, Baktalórántháza VSE archive and Baktalórántháza research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Baktalórántháza VSE”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Baktalórántháza VSE” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.