CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bagmasti

Armenian deity

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ4841999
Source-derived summary

Bagmasti (Armenian: Բաղմաստ) was a Urartian goddess. She was worshiped at Musasir in Ararat and was the companion or consort of Ḫaldi. Her temple, together with that of Ḫaldi was plundered and burned by Sargon II king of Assyria. At the excavation of Musasir references to "Ḫaldi and his wife, Bagmashtu" were found inscribed on some of the items.

Sources

References

Piotrovsky, Boris B. (1969) The Ancient Civilization of Urartu: An Archaeological Adventure. Cowles Book Co.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Bagmasti” as armenian deity. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Bagmasti, Armenian and deity.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1969—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Bagmasti, Armenian and deity providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Bagmasti”, the useful work is to connect “armenian deity” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4841999. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1969.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bagmasti”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bagmasti primary sources, Bagmasti archive and Bagmasti research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bagmasti”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bagmasti” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.