CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

BabyZone.com

website for mothers and mothers-to-be

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ17014745
Source-derived summary

BabyZone.com was a website for mothers and mothers-to-be. It offered information on the full pregnancy timeline, from "trying to conceive", through pregnancy, childbirth, and raising an infant.

BabyZone.com was owned and operated by The Walt Disney Company, specifically by the Disney Interactive Family business unit within Disney Interactive. Other sites in the Disney Interactive Family group include Spoonful.com and Babble.com.

Disney acquired BabyZone from Kaboose in April 2009.

Disney shut down BabyZone in 2014.

Editorial summary

“BabyZone.com” enters the record as website for mothers and mothers-to-be. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what BabyZone, website and mothers can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around BabyZone, website and mothers.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“BabyZone.com” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, BabyZone, website and mothers provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17014745. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2009 and 2014.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “BabyZone.com”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow BabyZone.com primary sources, BabyZone.com archive and BabyZone research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “BabyZone.com”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from BabyZone.com” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.