CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

B O D Y

online publication

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ17014698
Source-derived summary

B O D Y is an international online literary magazine publishing new work three times a year. B O D Y publishes short stories, poetry, creative nonfiction, reviews, translations, essays, artworks, photography, and has been noted for its elegant, intuitive design and for its editorial vision. B O D Y was founded in Prague by Christopher Crawford, Joshua Mensch, and Stephan Delbos in 2012. B O D Y was at the very forefront of the digital revolution of literary magazines and fostered the growing familiarity between US poets and their British counterparts at that time through providing an online platform which features the work of both. It is also noted for regularly publishing Central and Eastern European literature in translation. B O D Y is published in English language.

Notable contributors

Richard Siken

Niall Campbell

Ilya Kaminsky

Jack Underwood

John Glenday

Dara Wier

Francesca Bell

Luke Kennard

Geoffrey Nutter

Jeffrey McDaniel

Sam Riviere

Miklos Radnoti

Petr Hruška

Jane Hirshfield

Jill McDonough

Daniil Kharms

Anna Akhmatova

Laura Kasischke

Bruce Bond

Lucy Alibar

Robert Archambeau

Eugenio Montale

Chard deNiord

Rolf Dieter Brinkmann

Ernest Hilbert

Justin Quinn

David Morley

Alison Brackenbury

Matthew Olzmann

Masthead

Christopher Crawford - Founding Editor

Joshua Mensch - Founding Editor

Stephan Delbos - Founding Editor

Michael Stein - Fiction in Translation Editor

Jan Zikmund - Czech Editor

Jessica Mensch - Art Editor

See also

List of literary magazines

References

Further reading

"John Ashbery & Frank O'Hara on Erje Ayden, the Pulp Writer for the New York School". The Poetry Foundation. 19 April 2023.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “B O D Y” as online publication. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012, 2023—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2012-01-01. The account is most persuasive where online and publication can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as online publication. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17014698. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2012 and 2023.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “B O D Y”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow B O D Y primary sources, B O D Y archive and online research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “B O D Y”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from B O D Y” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.