CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton accretion

model for the accretion of a uniform gas by a massive body

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ135399734
Source-derived summary

Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton (BHL) accretion (also known as Bondi–Hoyle accretion) is a mathematical model for the accretion of a uniform gas by a massive body. It is a general model of accretion with multiple applications, such as accretion of the interstellar medium by neutron stars and black holes, or wind mass transfer in binary star systems.

It is named after Hermann Bondi, Fred Hoyle, and Raymond Lyttleton. An initial estimate of the accretion rate for a supersonic wind was derived by Hoyle and Lyttleton in 1939 to explain variations in the climate of the Earth. The generally accepted form of BHL accretion was derived by Bondi, who combined an improved version the earlier work with his own work on spherically symmetric accretion (known as Bondi accretion).

Accretion rate

The accretion rate (the amount of mass accreted per unit of time) of the BHL formalism is given by

M

˙

=

α

2

π

(

G

M

)

2

ρ

(

v

2

+

c

2

)

3

/

2

,

{\displaystyle {\dot {M}}=\alpha {\frac {2\pi (GM)^{2}\rho }{(v^{2}+c^{2})^{3/2}}},}

where

ρ

{\displaystyle \rho }

is the density of the gas;

v

{\displaystyle v}

is the relative velocity between the gas and the accreting body;

M

{\displaystyle M}

is the mass of the accreting body;

c

{\displaystyle c}

is the speed of sound in the gas;

α

{\displaystyle \alpha }

is a dimensionless factor between 1 and 2, which cannot be determined analytically.

History

In a 1939 paper, Fred Hoyle and Raymond Lyttleton considered the possibility that variations in the Earth's climate might be caused by the accretion of the interstellar medium (ISM) by the Sun. They proposed that when the Solar System moves through a cloud in the ISM, the Sun would accrete material from it, and created a model to mathematically explain this accretion rate. This would release the gravitational potential energy of the accreted material as radiation, which would increase the Earth's temperature. They claimed that this variation could be large enough to explain the occurrence of ice ages and the increase in radiation needed to explain the occurrence of the carboniferous.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton accretion” as model for the accretion of a uniform gas by a massive body. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Bondi, Hoyle and Lyttleton.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1939—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Bondi, Hoyle and Lyttleton providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton accretion”, the useful work is to connect “model for the accretion of a uniform gas by a massive body” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q135399734. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1939.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton accretion”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton accretion primary sources, Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton accretion archive and Bondi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton accretion”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Bondi–Hoyle–Lyttleton accretion” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.