CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority

government agency of Western Australia government

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 25, 2025
Entity authorityQ4948425
Source-derived summary

The Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority (BGPA) is a Western Australian Government authority charged with the administration of Kings Park and Bold Park.

It was announced on 28 April 2017 that the Department of Parks and Wildlife would merge with the Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, the Zoological Parks Authority, and the Rottnest Island Authority on 1 July 2017 to form the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions.

The earlier stages of administration of Kings Park and other gardens had been by individual autonomous boards.

The Kings Park Board had started in 1896.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority” as government agency of Western Australia government. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Botanic, Gardens and Parks.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2017, 1896—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Botanic, Gardens and Parks providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority”, the useful work is to connect “government agency of Western Australia government” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 25, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4948425. The first chronological checks are 2017 and 1896.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority primary sources, Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority archive and Botanic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.