CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Priestia megaterium

species of bacterium

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ148703 ↗
Source-derived summary

Priestia megaterium (Bacillus megaterium prior to 2020) is a rod-like, Gram-positive, mainly aerobic, spore forming bacterium found in widely diverse habitats. It has cells of roughly 1.5 μm by 4 μm (up to about 2.5 μm by 10 μm in some reports), which is quite large for bacteria and 100 times larger than Escherichia coli. The cells often occur in pairs and chains, where the cells are joined by polysaccharides on the cell walls.

Before the rise of Bacillus subtilis as the dominant Gram-positive model organism, P. megaterium was widely used for studies on biochemistry, sporulation, and bacteriophages. Recently, its popularity has started increasing in the field of biotechnology for its recombinant protein-production capacity.

Characteristics

P. megaterium grows at temperatures from 3 to 45 °C, with the optimum around 30 °C. Some isolates from an Antarctic geothermal lake were found to grow at temperatures up to 63 °C. It has been recognized as an endophyte and is a potential agent for the biocontrol of plant diseases. Nitrogen fixation has been demonstrated in some strains of P. megaterium. It is used as a plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) and biocontrol agent, which can reduce reliance on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, and it contributes to phosphate solubilization and to microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP), the latter being explored for applications such as self-healing concrete.

P. megaterium has been an important industrial organism for decades. It has been used to produce enzymes such as amylases used in the baking industry, glucose dehydrogenase used in glucose blood tests, enzymes for modifying corticosteroids, and several amino acid dehydrogenases.

Editorial summary

“Priestia megaterium” enters the record as species of bacterium. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Priestia, megaterium and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Priestia, megaterium and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Priestia megaterium” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Priestia, megaterium and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q148703. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2020.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Priestia megaterium”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Priestia megaterium primary sources, Priestia megaterium archive and Priestia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Priestia megaterium”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Priestia megaterium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.