CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

BOD bottle

scientific device

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ28455759 ↗
Source-derived summary

BOD Bottle or an incubation bottle is a main apparatus used for the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) test. During the five-day BOD or BOD5 test process, the BOD bottle is used for incubating diluted samples under the 20 °C or 68 °F of temperature.

Structure

The bottle is normally designed to have a special shoulder radius to push out all air from the inside of the bottle when a sample solution is being filled. According to Method 5210 in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, the BOD bottle should include a ground-glass stopper and a flared mouth which form a water seal preventing the air from the outside of the bottle coming in. Method 5210 also recommends to use a paper, a foil or a plastic cup to cap over the mouth of the bottle reducing the evaporation during the incubation. Generally, the side of the BOD bottle is permanently screened with white writing area, and is printed with a specific number; both for the aid of the sample identification.

Stopper

There are two kinds of stopper: the Glass Pennyhead and the Glass Robotic stopper.

Sizes

There are many BOD bottle sizes. The dose of the mixture of the solution (nutrient, mineral and buffer solution) is related to the size of the bottle. For the Standard Methods 5210, the BOD bottle “having 60 mL or greater capacity (300-mL)” is mentioned as one of the apparatus for the BOD test.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “BOD bottle” as scientific device. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around bottle, scientific and device.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 242-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with bottle, scientific and device providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “BOD bottle”, the useful work is to connect “scientific device” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28455759. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “BOD bottle”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow BOD bottle primary sources, BOD bottle archive and bottle research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “BOD bottle”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “BOD bottle” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.