CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Azima sarmentosa

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ4832601
Source-derived summary

Azima sarmentosa is a species of flowering plant in the Salvadoraceae family. It is a shrub or tree native to Indochina (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam), southern Hainan, the Philippines, Java, the Lesser Sunda Islands, Sulawesi, and New Guinea.

The species was first described as Actegeton sarmentosus by Carl Ludwig Blume in 1827. In 1876 George Bentham and

Joseph Dalton Hooker placed the species in genus Azima as A. sarmentosa.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Azima sarmentosa” is species of plant. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Azima, sarmentosa and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1827, 1876—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Azima, sarmentosa and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of plant” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4832601. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1827 and 1876.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Azima sarmentosa”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Azima sarmentosa primary sources, Azima sarmentosa archive and Azima research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Azima sarmentosa”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Azima sarmentosa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.