CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Aylostera deminuta

species of cactus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ93121645 ↗
Source-derived summary

Aylostera deminuta, synonym Rebutia deminuta, is a species of flowering plant in the family Cactaceae, native to Bolivia and northwest Argentina. The exact delimitation of the species varies, but sources agree that it is a short cactus with ribbed stems and orange to red flowers.

Description

Like other members of the clade to which it belongs, Aylostera deminuta usually has fibrous rather than tuberous roots. Its flower parts are fused together, at least at the base. The scales on the pericarpels and receptacles are of the same colour as the receptacles, rather than being darker or having dark tips. The species has been described separately under a number of synonyms, including Rebutia deminuta, Rebutia pseudodeminuta and Rebutia simoniana. As R. deminuta, it is described as forming clumps, with individual ribbed stems about 2.5 cm across, and having deep orange-red flowers about 3 cm long and wide. Other forms are described as solitary, with larger stems (up to about 10 cm high) and somewhat larger flowers, which are orange or carmine red.

Taxonomy

Aylostera deminuta was first described by Frédéric Weber in 1904 as Echinopsis deminuta. In 1923, Britton and Rose transferred it to the genus Rebutia as Rebutia deminuta, and in 1936, Curt Backeberg transferred it to Aylostera.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Aylostera deminuta” is species of cactus. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Aylostera, deminuta and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1904, 1923, 1936—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Aylostera, deminuta and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of cactus” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q93121645. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1904, 1923 and 1936.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Aylostera deminuta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Aylostera deminuta primary sources, Aylostera deminuta archive and Aylostera research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Aylostera deminuta”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Aylostera deminuta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.