CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Automorphic L-function

mathematical concept

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 20, 2025
Entity authorityQ4826697
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, an automorphic L-function is a function L(s,π,r) of a complex variable s, associated to an automorphic representation π of a reductive group G over a global field and a finite-dimensional complex representation r of the Langlands dual group LG of G, generalizing the Dirichlet L-series of a Dirichlet character and the Mellin transform of a modular form. They were introduced by Langlands (1967, 1970, 1971).

Borel (1979) and Arthur & Gelbart (1991) gave surveys of automorphic L-functions.

Properties

Automorphic

L

{\displaystyle L}

-functions should have the following properties (which have been proved in some cases but are still conjectural in other cases).

The L-function

L

(

s

,

π

,

r

)

{\displaystyle L(s,\pi ,r)}

should be a product over the places

v

{\displaystyle v}

of

F

{\displaystyle F}

of local

L

{\displaystyle L}

functions.

L

(

s

,

π

,

r

)

=

v

L

(

s

,

π

v

,

r

v

)

{\displaystyle L(s,\pi ,r)=\prod _{v}L(s,\pi _{v},r_{v})}

Here the automorphic representation

π

=

π

v

{\displaystyle \pi =\otimes \pi _{v}}

is a tensor product of the representations

π

v

{\displaystyle \pi _{v}}

of local groups.

The L-function is expected to have an analytic continuation as a meromorphic function of all complex

s

{\displaystyle s}

, and satisfy a functional equation

L

(

s

,

π

,

r

)

=

ϵ

(

s

,

π

,

r

)

L

(

1

s

,

π

,

r

)

{\displaystyle L(s,\pi ,r)=\epsilon (s,\pi ,r)L(1-s,\pi ,r^{\lor })}

where the factor

ϵ

(

s

,

π

,

r

)

{\displaystyle \epsilon (s,\pi ,r)}

is a product of "local constants"

ϵ

(

s

,

π

,

r

)

=

v

ϵ

(

s

,

π

v

,

r

v

,

ψ

v

)

{\displaystyle \epsilon (s,\pi ,r)=\prod _{v}\epsilon (s,\pi _{v},r_{v},\psi _{v})}

almost all of which are 1.

General linear groups

Godement & Jacquet (1972) constructed the automorphic L-functions for general linear groups with r the standard representation (so-called standard L-functions) and verified analytic continuation and the functional equation, by using a generalization of the method in Tate's thesis. Ubiquitous in the Langlands Program are Rankin-Selberg products of representations of GL(m) and GL(n). The resulting Rankin-Selberg L-functions satisfy a number of analytic properties, their functional equation being first proved via the Langlands–Shahidi method.

Editorial summary

“Automorphic L-function” enters the record as mathematical concept. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Automorphic, L-function and mathematical can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1967, 1970, 1971, 1979—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Automorphic, L-function and mathematical.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Automorphic L-function” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Automorphic, L-function and mathematical provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 20, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4826697. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1967, 1970, 1971 and 1979.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Automorphic L-function”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Automorphic L-function primary sources, Automorphic L-function archive and Automorphic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Automorphic L-function”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Automorphic L-function” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.