CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Grevillea robusta

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ1989614
Source-derived summary

Grevillea robusta, commonly known as the southern silky oak, silk oak or silky oak, silver oak or Australian silver oak, is a species of flowering plant in the family Proteaceae and is endemic to eastern Australia. It is a tree with deeply dissected, divided leaves, golden yellow to orange flowers with red blotches and flattened, elliptic to oval fruit.

Description

Grevillea robusta is a fast-growing tree that typically grows to a height of 8–40 m (26–131 ft) with a single stem and dark grey, furrowed bark. Its leaves are 10–34 cm (3.9–13.4 in) long and 90–150 mm (3.5–5.9 in) wide and deeply dissected with 11 to 24 primary lobes, sometimes with up to five further divisions, the end lobes oblong to elliptic or almost triangular, 5–50 mm (0.20–1.97 in) long and 2–10 mm (0.079–0.394 in) wide. Many of the leaves are lost before flowering.

The flowers are arranged in one-sided, toothbrush-like groups, sometimes branched, 12–16 cm (4.7–6.3 in) long, each flower on a pedicel 7.5–16 mm (0.30–0.63 in) long. The carpel (the female part) of each flower has a stalk 21–28 mm (0.83–1.10 in) long. The flowers are glabrous and mostly yellowish orange, with reddish blotches. Flowering occurs from September to November and the fruit that follows is a glabrous follicle.

Taxonomy and naming

Grevillea robusta was first formally described in 1830 by Robert Brown after an unpublished description by Allan Cunningham.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Grevillea robusta” as species of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1830—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Grevillea, robusta and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1989614. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1830.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Grevillea robusta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Grevillea robusta primary sources, Grevillea robusta archive and Grevillea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Grevillea robusta”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Grevillea robusta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.