CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ausable Chasm

sandstone gorge near Keeseville, NY, USA

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ4822704
Source-derived summary

Ausable Chasm is a sandstone gorge and tourist attraction located near the hamlet of Keeseville, New York, United States, due west of Port Kent. The gorge is about two miles (3.2 km) long and is about 150 feet (46 m) deep.

Ausable Chasm is the namesake of the Ausable River, which runs through the gorge and empties into Lake Champlain about one mile (1.6 km) away. The gorge started forming about 10,000 years ago through headward erosion caused by Rainbow Falls, a 91 feet (28 m) waterfall at the gorge's southern extreme. The gorge is a major tourist attraction and landmark in the Adirondacks region of Upstate New York.

Geology

Ausable Chasm is carved out of a 500-million-year-old, 520-foot (160 m)-thick exposure of Cambrian Potsdam Sandstone. The sandstone of the gorge, formed from ancient tidal flats, preserves ripple marks, ichnofossils, and rare mid-Cambrian Scyphomedusae jellyfish fossils.

Ausable Chasm itself is a result of the conclusion of the last glacial period at the end of the Pleistocene, about 10,000 years ago. Prior to the formation of the gorge, the movement of the Laurentide ice sheet during the last glacial period carved deep cliffs along the Champlain Valley, which were subsequently covered in glacial till. By the end of the last glacial period, the melting ice sheets formed the vast Champlain Sea, which inundated the current location of the chasm.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Ausable Chasm” is sandstone gorge near Keeseville, NY, USA. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Ausable, Chasm and sandstone, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 228-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Ausable, Chasm and sandstone is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “sandstone gorge near Keeseville, NY, USA” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4822704. Authority coordinates are 44.529, -73.461. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ausable Chasm”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ausable Chasm primary sources, Ausable Chasm archive and Ausable research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ausable Chasm”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ausable Chasm” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.