CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Aurel Șuteu

Romanian amateur wrestler

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ20030768 ↗
Source-derived summary

Aurel Șuteu (born 8 December 1957) is a Romanian wrestler. He competed in the men's freestyle 62 kg at the 1980 Summer Olympics. Aurel Șuteu is known for winning a match against Brian Aspen by decision in the 3rd round of the 1980 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Aurel Șuteu” as romanian amateur wrestler. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Aurel, Șuteu and Romanian.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1957, 1980—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1957-12-08. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Aurel, Șuteu and Romanian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Aurel Șuteu”, the useful work is to connect “romanian amateur wrestler” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q20030768. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1957 and 1980.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Aurel Șuteu”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Aurel Șuteu primary sources, Aurel Șuteu archive and Aurel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Aurel Șuteu”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Aurel Șuteu” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.