CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Audrius Žuta

Lithuanian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ4820208
Source-derived summary

Audrius Žuta (born 5 January 1969) is a Lithuanian former football player and referee.

Career

He obtained a total number of 26 caps for the Lithuania national football team, scoring two goals. After retirement from playing he worked as football referee from 2002 until 2007.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Audrius Žuta” is lithuanian footballer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Audrius, Žuta and Lithuanian, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1969, 2002, 2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1969-01-05. For this dossier, Audrius, Žuta and Lithuanian is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “lithuanian footballer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4820208. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1969, 2002 and 2007.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Audrius Žuta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Audrius Žuta primary sources, Audrius Žuta archive and Audrius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Audrius Žuta”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Audrius Žuta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.