Auditory-verbal therapy
method for teaching deaf children to listen and speak using their hearing technology

Auditory-verbal therapy is a method for teaching deaf children to listen and speak using hearing technology such as hearing aids and auditory implants (such as cochlear implants and assistive listening devices). Auditory-verbal therapy emphasizes listening and seeks to promote the development of the auditory brain to facilitate learning to communicate through talking. It is based on the child's use of optimally fitted hearing technology.
Research
First Voice, a membership body which represents organisations that provide listening and spoken language programmes in Australia, New Zealand and across the globe, published a study in February 2015 based on information from more than 600 children with hearing loss. When listening and spoken language outcomes of children with hearing loss, including those with additional difficulties, were compared to those with typical hearing, most children attending AV programmes had scores within or above the average range for typical hearing children for language (75%), vocabulary (80%) and speech performance (70%). (First Voice, 2015 pp 5). Data from over 1,400 children and their families supported by First Voice organisations in 2018 across Australia, New Zealand and the UK shows that 86% of the early intervention AV graduates who had hearing loss only are within or above the range for age-matched, typically developing children without hearing loss.
In 2016, Kaiper and Danser published a systematic review looking at the efficacy of the Auditory Verbal (AV) approach. They found that: (i) AV approach can help children with hearing impairment, even beyond three years of age, to develop age appropriate language skills and catch up; (ii) children could recognize words accurately even in the presence of background noise; and, (iii) children who benefitted from receiving AV intervention could be successfully integrated within mainstream schooling.
Hogan et al.
“Auditory-verbal therapy” enters the record as method for teaching deaf children to listen and speak using their hearing technology. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Auditory-verbal, therapy and method can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Auditory-verbal therapy” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Auditory-verbal, therapy and method provides the most credible route into that argument.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4820022. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2018 and 2016.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Auditory-verbal therapy”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Auditory-verbal therapy primary sources, Auditory-verbal therapy archive and Auditory-verbal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Auditory-verbal therapy”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Auditory-verbal therapy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.