CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Atrephes

genus of insects

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 18, 2025
Entity authorityQ4817527 ↗
Source-derived summary

Atrephes is a genus of moths of the family Noctuidae. The genus was erected by E. Dukinfield Jones in 1908.

Species

Atrephes albiluna Hampson, 1908 Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul)

Atrephes phocea Jones, 1908 Brazil (Paraná)

References

External links

Original description: Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1908.

Editorial summary

“Atrephes” enters the record as genus of insects. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Atrephes, genus and insects can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1908—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Atrephes, genus and insects.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Atrephes” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Atrephes, genus and insects provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4817527. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1908.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Atrephes”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Atrephes primary sources, Atrephes archive and Atrephes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Atrephes”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Atrephes” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.