CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Particulate matter

microscopic solid or liquid matter suspended in the Earth's atmosphere

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ498957
Source-derived summary

Particulate matter (PM) or particulates are microscopic particles of solid or liquid matter suspended in the air. The combination of particulates and air is called an aerosol. Sources of particulate matter can be either natural or occur as a result of human activities. Particulates may adversely affect human health and impact climate and precipitation.

Categories of atmospheric particles include inhalable coarse particles, designated PM10, which are particles of coarse granularity, with a particle diameter of 10 micrometers (μm) or less; fine particles, designated PM2.5, with a diameter of 2.5 μm or less; ultrafine particles, PM.10 with a diameter of 100 nanometers (nm) or less; and soot (fine or ultrafine particles primarily made up of carbon).

Airborne particulate matter is a IARC Group 1 carcinogen. Particulate matter is considered the most dangerous type of air pollution because particulates can penetrate deep into the lungs and travel through the blood stream to multiple organs, such as the brain. Particulate matter contributes to health problems such as stroke, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, many types of cancer, and preterm birth. It is associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment. There is no safe level for exposure to particulates.

Editorial summary

“Particulate matter” enters the record as microscopic solid or liquid matter suspended in the Earth's atmosphere. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Particulate, matter and microscopic can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 195-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Particulate, matter and microscopic.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Particulate matter” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Particulate, matter and microscopic provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q498957. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Particulate matter”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Particulate matter primary sources, Particulate matter archive and Particulate research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Particulate matter”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Particulate matter” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.