CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Atetsu District, Okayama

former district in Okayama prefecture, Japan

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ4813143
Source-derived summary

Atetsu (阿哲郡, Atetsu-gun) was a district located in Okayama Prefecture, Japan.

As of 2003, the district had an estimated population of 13,546 and a density of 30.70 persons per km2. The total area was 441.28 km2.

Towns and villages

Ōsa

Shingō

Tessei

Tetta

Merger

On March 31, 2005 - the towns of Ōsa, Shingō, Tessei and Tetta were merged into the expanded city of Niimi. Therefore, Atetsu District was dissolved as a result of this merger.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Atetsu District, Okayama” is former district in Okayama prefecture, Japan. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Atetsu, District and Okayama, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2003, 2005—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1900-04-01. For this dossier, Atetsu, District and Okayama is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “former district in Okayama prefecture, Japan” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4813143. VIAF identifies the subject as 256243043. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2003 and 2005.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Atetsu District, Okayama”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Atetsu District, Okayama primary sources, Atetsu District, Okayama archive and Atetsu research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Atetsu District, Okayama”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Atetsu District, Okayama” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.