At Brand project
Open-knowledge reference entry

AT.Brand is a European project co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), Interreg Atlantic Area IVB supporting transnational cooperation projects in Atlantica regions. Between 1 January 2014 and September 2015, the project focused on innovation and management in integrated city branding.
Interreg Atlantic Area IVB programme
Interreg Atlantic Area IVB is the fourth transnational cooperation programme in the area and aims to contribute to the territorial cohesion of the Atlantic Area. Regional cooperation is carried out by common strategy actions and the exchange of know-how.
The programme consists of 27 cooperation areas in the United Kingdom, Ireland, France, Spain, and Portugal. These countries are typically considered as sharing a strong cultural identity, history and heritage, as well as a similar geographic and maritime environment.
Purpose of the project
Partners
The project is led by Dublin City Council. The remaining six partners are:
Câmara Municipal de Faro
Cardiff City Council
Communauté d'agglomération de La Rochelle
Conférence des Villes de l’Arc Atlantique
Fomento San Sebastian
Liverpool Vision.
Other cities and institutions are also invited to share the project.
Integrated city branding strategy
City branding is understood by partners as a complete and human communication strategy.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “At Brand project” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q22906505. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2014 and 2015.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “At Brand project”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow At Brand project primary sources, At Brand project archive and Brand research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “At Brand project”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “At Brand project” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.