CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Asylum law in Switzerland

overview of the right for asylum in Switzerland

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ515663 ↗
Source-derived summary

Asylum law in Switzerland is the responsibility of the Swiss Confederation, while the cantons are responsible for implementing the decisions of the State Secretariat for Migration (SEM).

Legal basis

Asylum law in Switzerland is governed by the Asylum Act of 1998 (AsylA), the Foreign Nationals and Integration Act of 2005 (FNIA) and the Geneva Convention of July 28, 1951. Switzerland applies Regulation (EU) no. 604/2013, known as "Dublin III", which determines which member state is responsible for processing an asylum application from a third-country national.

The cantonal laws and implementing regulations specify the role of the organizations responsible for helping migrants. In the canton of Vaud, for example, the Etablissement Vaudois d'Accueil des Migrants (EVAM) operates under the Law on Assistance to Asylum Seekers and Certain Categories of Foreigners, as well as other cantonal acts governing social assistance and the integration of foreigners.

Asylum application

Anyone can submit an asylum application at a border crossing, at a Swiss airport checkpoint or at a confederation center. Filing an asylum application on Swiss territory entitles the applicant to remain in the country throughout the first-instance procedure and any ordinary appeal.

Federal Asylum Centres (FAC)

Anyone applying for asylum in Switzerland is automatically directed to one of the FACs, where he or she will be taken into care for a period of 140 days, after which he or she will be allocated to a canton responsible for providing accommodation and subsistence until a decision is reached on the asylum application.

The federal centers are divided into regions or cantons, with one FAC handling procedural tasks, while others deal mainly with accommodation.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Asylum law in Switzerland” as overview of the right for asylum in Switzerland. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Asylum, Switzerland and overview.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1998, 2005, 1951, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Asylum, Switzerland and overview providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Asylum law in Switzerland”, the useful work is to connect “overview of the right for asylum in Switzerland” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q515663. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998, 2005, 1951 and 2013.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Asylum law in Switzerland”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Asylum law in Switzerland primary sources, Asylum law in Switzerland archive and Asylum research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Asylum law in Switzerland”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Asylum law in Switzerland” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.