CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Peace Land Dignity

political party in Italy

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ123111657
Source-derived summary

Peace Land Dignity (Italian: Pace Terra Dignità, PTD) was a pacifist electoral alliance in Italy founded by journalist and television host Michele Santoro on February 14th, 2024, following the breakup of Unione Popolare, a left-wing to far-left coalition that had participated in the 2022 Italian general election. The list, which included three left-wing minor parties, was launched in September 2023 in Rome, with the aim of taking part in the 2024 European Parliament election in Italy. As of 2026, the alliance is de facto defunct, as the Communist Refoundation Party (the only somewhat structured party in the coalition) seeks to join the broader centre-left Campo Largo alliance.

Editorial summary

“Peace Land Dignity” enters the record as political party in Italy. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Peace, Land and Dignity can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024, 2022, 2023, 2026—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Peace, Land and Dignity.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Peace Land Dignity” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Peace, Land and Dignity provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q123111657. The first chronological checks are 2024, 2022, 2023 and 2026.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Peace Land Dignity”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Peace Land Dignity primary sources, Peace Land Dignity archive and Peace research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Peace Land Dignity”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Peace Land Dignity” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.