CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Waxy corn

mutation in Zea mays

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ3303415
Source-derived summary

Waxy corn or glutinous corn is a type of corn (maize) characterized by its sticky texture when cooked. It has big round kernels that have endosperms that are almost universally white, though the aleurone layers can sometimes be purple or red which cause some cultivars to be multi-colored or even deep purple to black.

Waxy corn is absent in the Americas and is believed to have originated from a single chromosomal mutation soon after the introduction of corn to Asia from the Americas. They include a large number of genetically diverse cultivars from various countries that have adapted to a wide range of tropical to temperate environments. It is common throughout Southeast Asia (the Philippines, eastern Indonesia, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, and Myanmar) and East Asia (China, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea)

The stickiness of waxy corn cultivars is the result of the presence of larger amounts of amylopectin starch in contrast to regular corn (which has larger amounts of amylose starch).

The Ac/Ds transposable controlling elements, where short sections of DNA have an intrinsic property to move within the genome, were first isolated and sequenced using insertions of Ac and Ds into the well-studied waxy corn Waxy (Wx1) gene in 1983. Transposable elements and their behaviour i.e., "jumping genes" had previously been characterised in maize and published by Barbara McClintock in 1947, leading to her 1983 Nobel Prize in Medicine.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Waxy corn” as mutation in Zea mays. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1983, 1947—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Waxy, corn and mutation can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as mutation in Zea mays. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3303415. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1983 and 1947.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Waxy corn”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Waxy corn primary sources, Waxy corn archive and Waxy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Waxy corn”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Waxy corn” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.