CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

As Barbas do Imperador

biography of Dom Pedro II

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 20, 2024
Entity authorityQ18238040 ↗
Source-derived summary

As Barbas do Imperador – D. Pedro II, um monarca nos trópicos (The Emperor's Beard: Dom Pedro II and His Tropical Monarchy in Brazil in English) is a non-fiction biography book written by Brazilian historian Lilia Moritz Schwarcz about the life and reign of Dom Pedro II, from his birth to his death. The book won the Prêmio Jabuti in 1999.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “As Barbas do Imperador” is biography of Dom Pedro II. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Barbas, Imperador and biography, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1998-11-30. For this dossier, Barbas, Imperador and biography is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “biography of Dom Pedro II” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q18238040. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “As Barbas do Imperador”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow As Barbas do Imperador primary sources, As Barbas do Imperador archive and Barbas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “As Barbas do Imperador”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “As Barbas do Imperador” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.