Arvies
short story by Adam-Troy Castro
"Arvies" is a 2010 science fiction short story by Adam-Troy Castro. It was first published in Lightspeed Magazine, and subsequently republished in Castro's anthology Her Husband's Hands, as well as in the compilations Lightspeed: Year One, Nebula Awards Showcase: 2012 and The Year's Best Science Fiction and Fantasy: 2011.
Synopsis
In a distant future ruled by superintelligent fetuses who have been genetically engineered to live centuries in utero, life has been legally redefined as lasting from fertilisation to birth, such that everyone who has been born is legally dead: disposable near-mindless slaves whose only purpose is to act as living "vehicles" for the fetuses that are robotically transplanted into them. One such fetus is Jennifer Axioma-Singh, who decides she wants an experience that no other fetus has ever had: to give birth.
The story does not explain the derivation of the term "arvies," which is this far-future's term for the human beings this far future allows to grow to maturity, to serve as vessels for the super-advanced fetuses. The author left it down to the reader to recognize the acronym RV, or "recreational vehicle."
Reception
"Arvies" won the 2011 Million Writers Award for best short story, and was nominated for the 2011 Nebula Award for Best Short Story.
“Arvies” enters the record as short story by Adam-Troy Castro. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Arvies, short and story can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Arvies” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Arvies, short and story provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 23, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q25348521. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010, 2012 and 2011.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Arvies”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Arvies primary sources, Arvies archive and Arvies research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Arvies”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Arvies” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.