CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Hugh Chaplin

British librarian

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ17986377
Source-derived summary

Arthur Hugh Chaplin (17 April 1905 – 24 December 1996) was an English librarian who was Principal Keeper of Printed Books at the British Museum. He was a prolific author in the fields of librarianship and cataloguing, working hard to achieve an international standard for cataloguing through participation in the major international conferences of his time.

In 1963, Chaplin was the first non-American recipient of the Margaret Mann Citation in Cataloguing and Classification for ‘his masterly preparation of the Draft Statement of Principles which showed creative insight into universal conditions of bibliographical entry’ and would form the basis of an international agreement reached at the IFLA Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961.

Early life

Arthur Hugh Chaplin was born in Bexhill-on-Sea on 17 April 1905. He was the son of Herbert Frederick Chaplin, a Wesleyan Minister, and his wife, Florence Bessie (née Lusher). The young Chaplin was educated at Bedford Modern School and later studied Latin at the University of London. After his degree he obtained a Diploma of The School of Librarianship and Archives at University College London. He was demonstrably adept at modern languages and used his skills to great effect as a later interpreter at international cataloguing conferences.

Career

Chaplin's career in librarianship began at the university libraries of Reading and Belfast. He joined the British Museum in 1930 as its Assistant Keeper and was promoted to Deputy Keeper of Printed Books in 1956.

Editorial summary

“Hugh Chaplin” enters the record as british librarian. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Hugh, Chaplin and British can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1905, 1996, 1963, 1961—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1905-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Hugh, Chaplin and British.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Hugh Chaplin” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Hugh, Chaplin and British provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17986377. VIAF identifies the subject as 71412918. The Library of Congress control number is n50036329. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1905, 1996, 1963 and 1961.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Hugh Chaplin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Hugh Chaplin primary sources, Hugh Chaplin archive and Hugh research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Hugh Chaplin”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Hugh Chaplin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.