CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Arminius (journal)

magazine

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ688573 ↗
Source-derived summary

Arminius (named after the Cheruscan leader Arminius) was a German Conservative Revolutionary magazine published during the Weimar Republic. It succeeded the journal Die Standarte and Ernst Jünger also served for a time as a co-editor. It described itself as independent of any specific nationalist group.

References

Sources

Hoffacker, Ursula (1992). "Ernst Jünger". Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (in German). Vol. 3. Archived from the original on 2007-06-16.

Griffiths, Richard (2006).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Arminius (journal)” as magazine. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Arminius, journal and magazine.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1992, 2007, 2006—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Arminius, journal and magazine providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Arminius (journal)”, the useful work is to connect “magazine” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q688573. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1992, 2007 and 2006.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Arminius (journal)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Arminius (journal) primary sources, Arminius (journal) archive and Arminius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Arminius (journal)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Arminius (journal)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.