CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Armageddon (2005)

2005 professional wrestling pay-per-view event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ2597023
Source-derived summary

The 2005 Armageddon was a professional wrestling pay-per-view (PPV) event produced by World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE). It was the sixth Armageddon and took place on December 18, 2005, at the Dunkin' Donuts Center in Providence, Rhode Island, held primarily for wrestlers from the promotion's SmackDown! brand division.

The main event was a Hell in a Cell match between Randy Orton and The Undertaker, which Undertaker won by pinfall after performing a Tombstone piledriver. One of the predominant matches on the card was an interpromotional tag team match pitting SmackDown!'s WWE Tag Team Champions, Rey Mysterio and Batista, against Raw's World Tag Team Champions, Big Show and Kane, in a non-title champions versus champions match. Big Show and Kane won the match after Kane pinned Mysterio following a chokeslam. Another primary match on the undercard was Booker T versus Chris Benoit in the fourth match of their "Best of 7" series for the vacant WWE United States Championship. Benoit won the match after forcing Booker to submit with the Crippler Crossface, thus earning his first victory in the series.

Production

Background

Armageddon was a professional wrestling pay-per-view (PPV) event established by World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) in 1999 and held every December except in 2001. The sixth event was held on December 18, 2005, at the Dunkin' Donuts Center in Providence, Rhode Island.

Editorial summary

“Armageddon (2005)” enters the record as 2005 professional wrestling pay-per-view event. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Armageddon, professional and wrestling can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005, 1999, 2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Armageddon, professional and wrestling.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Armageddon (2005)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Armageddon, professional and wrestling provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2597023. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2005, 1999 and 2001.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Armageddon (2005)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Armageddon (2005) primary sources, Armageddon (2005) archive and Armageddon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Armageddon (2005)”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Armageddon (2005)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.