CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Argaplana

genus of worms

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 26, 2025
Entity authorityQ21221184
Source-derived summary

Argaplana is a genus of land planarians, the only member of the tribe Argaplanini in the family Rhynchodeminae. It contains the sole species Argaplana ranuii. It is native to New Zealand.

Description

The tribe Argaplanini is characterized by pigment cup eyes in multiple rows around the body's front tip that continue to the back end along the dorsal side, ventral testes and efferent ducts, tripartite cutaneous musculature, cutaneous longitudinal muscles in bundles, a lack of a ring zone, and a creeping sole that is over half of the body width.

The genus Argaplana is characterized by a small, tapered body with a mouth at the mid-third of the body, muscles that are longitudinal, circular, and helical, a penis lacking papilla, ovovitelline ducts that unite then enter the female genital canal ventro-posteriorly, and a lack of a resorptive bursa, adenodactyls and a viscid gland.

Argaplana ranuii is a cream-white color with a slightly paler creeping sole. Its body has a blunt front end and a rounded back end. Multiple eyes are crowded around the front tip.

Etymology

The generic name of Argaplana, and the tribe name by extension, are derived from Argus Panoptes, the many-eyed giant of Greek mythology, and the Latin word plana, meaning "planarian". This is in reference to the planarian's several eyes at its anterior tip.

Editorial summary

“Argaplana” enters the record as genus of worms. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Argaplana, genus and worms can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 218-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Argaplana, genus and worms.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Argaplana” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Argaplana, genus and worms provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q21221184. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Argaplana”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Argaplana primary sources, Argaplana archive and Argaplana research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Argaplana”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Argaplana” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.