CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

A priori estimate

type of estimate for the size of a solution of a differential equation

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ4660961 ↗
Source-derived summary

In the theory of partial differential equations, an a priori estimate (also called an apriori estimate or a priori bound) is an estimate for the size of a solution or its derivatives of a partial differential equation. A priori is Latin for "from before" and refers to the fact that the estimate for the solution is derived before the solution is known to exist. One reason for their importance is that if one can prove an a priori estimate for solutions of a differential equation, then it is often possible to prove that solutions exist using the continuity method or a fixed point theorem.

A priori estimates were introduced and named by Sergei Natanovich Bernstein, who used them to prove existence of solutions to second order nonlinear elliptic equations in the plane. Some other early influential examples of a priori estimates include the Schauder estimates given by Juliusz Schauder, and the estimates given by De Giorgi and Nash for second order elliptic or parabolic equations in many variables, in their respective solutions to Hilbert's nineteenth problem.

References

Further reading

Brezis, Haïm; Browder, Felix (1998), "Partial differential equations in the 20th century", Advances in Mathematics, 135 (1): 76–144, doi:10.1006/aima.1997.1713, ISSN 0001-8708, MR 1617413

Evans, Lawrence C. (2010) [1998], Partial differential equations, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “A priori estimate” as type of estimate for the size of a solution of a differential equation. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around priori, estimate and type.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1998, 1006, 1997, 1713—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with priori, estimate and type providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “A priori estimate”, the useful work is to connect “type of estimate for the size of a solution of a differential equation” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4660961. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998, 1006, 1997 and 1713.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “A priori estimate”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow A priori estimate primary sources, A priori estimate archive and priori research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “A priori estimate”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “A priori estimate” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.