A priori estimate
type of estimate for the size of a solution of a differential equation

In the theory of partial differential equations, an a priori estimate (also called an apriori estimate or a priori bound) is an estimate for the size of a solution or its derivatives of a partial differential equation. A priori is Latin for "from before" and refers to the fact that the estimate for the solution is derived before the solution is known to exist. One reason for their importance is that if one can prove an a priori estimate for solutions of a differential equation, then it is often possible to prove that solutions exist using the continuity method or a fixed point theorem.
A priori estimates were introduced and named by Sergei Natanovich Bernstein, who used them to prove existence of solutions to second order nonlinear elliptic equations in the plane. Some other early influential examples of a priori estimates include the Schauder estimates given by Juliusz Schauder, and the estimates given by De Giorgi and Nash for second order elliptic or parabolic equations in many variables, in their respective solutions to Hilbert's nineteenth problem.
References
Further reading
Brezis, Haïm; Browder, Felix (1998), "Partial differential equations in the 20th century", Advances in Mathematics, 135 (1): 76–144, doi:10.1006/aima.1997.1713, ISSN 0001-8708, MR 1617413
Evans, Lawrence C. (2010) [1998], Partial differential equations, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol.
The public source identifies “A priori estimate” as type of estimate for the size of a solution of a differential equation. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around priori, estimate and type.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “A priori estimate”, the useful work is to connect “type of estimate for the size of a solution of a differential equation” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4660961. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1998, 1006, 1997 and 1713.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “A priori estimate”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow A priori estimate primary sources, A priori estimate archive and priori research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “A priori estimate”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “A priori estimate” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.