CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Grapholita lobarzewskii

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ13375975 ↗
Source-derived summary

Grapholita lobarzewskii, the appleseed moth, small fruit tortrix or smaller fruit tortrix moth, is a moth of the family Tortricidae. It was described by Maksymilian Nowicki in 1860. It is found in large parts of Europe, except Norway, the Iberian Peninsula and most of the Balkan Peninsula.

The wingspan is 13–14 mm.

Adults are on wing from May to June.

The larvae feed within the fruit of Prunus and Malus species.

Editorial summary

“Grapholita lobarzewskii” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Grapholita, lobarzewskii and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1860—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Grapholita, lobarzewskii and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Grapholita lobarzewskii” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Grapholita, lobarzewskii and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q13375975. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1860.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Grapholita lobarzewskii”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Grapholita lobarzewskii primary sources, Grapholita lobarzewskii archive and Grapholita research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Grapholita lobarzewskii”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Grapholita lobarzewskii” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.