CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Meroles

genus of reptiles

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ592128 ↗
Source-derived summary

Meroles is a genus of lizards, commonly known as desert lizards, in the family Lacertidae. The genus contains eight species, inhabiting southwestern Africa, especially the Namib Desert.

Description

Desert lizards have fine, granular dorsal scales. The hind toes are elongated and possess fringes of scales.

Species

The following eight species are recognized as being valid.

Meroles anchietae (Bocage, 1867) - shovel-snouted lizard, Anchieta's dune lizard

Meroles ctenodactylus (A. Smith, 1838) - giant desert lizard, Smith's sand lizard, Smith's desert lizard

Meroles cuneirostris (Strauch, 1867) -wedge-snouted sand lizard, wedge-snouted desert lizard

Meroles knoxii (Milne-Edwards, 1829) - Knox's ocellated sand lizard, Knox's desert lizard

Meroles micropholidotus Mertens, 1938 - small-scaled desert lizard

Meroles reticulatus (Bocage, 1867) - reticulate sand lizard

Meroles squamulosus (W. Peters, 1869) - common rough-scaled lizard, savanna lizard

Meroles suborbitalis (W. Peters, 1854) - spotted sand lizard

Nota bene: A binomial authority in parentheses indicates that the species was originally described in a genus other than Meroles.

References

Further reading

Gray JE (1838). "Catalogue of the Slender-tongued Saurians, with Descriptions of many new Genera and Species". Annals and Magazine of Natural History, [First Series] 1: 274–283, 388–394. (Meroles, new genus, p.

Editorial summary

“Meroles” enters the record as genus of reptiles. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Meroles, genus and reptiles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1867, 1838, 1829, 1938—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Meroles, genus and reptiles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Meroles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Meroles, genus and reptiles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q592128. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1867, 1838, 1829 and 1938.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Meroles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Meroles primary sources, Meroles archive and Meroles research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Meroles”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Meroles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.