CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pterocryptis

genus of fishes

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ3759696
Source-derived summary

Pterocryptis is a genus of sheatfish. These fish are medium-sized catfishes usually found in fast flowing mountain streams throughout India, southern China and Southeast Asia. P. buccata is a cavefish.

Species

There are currently 17 recognized species in this genus:

Pterocryptis anomala (Herre, 1934)

Pterocryptis barakensis Vishwanath & Nebeshwar Sharma, 2006

Pterocryptis berdmorei (Blyth, 1860)

Pterocryptis bokorensis (Pellegrin & Chevey, 1937)

Pterocryptis buccata H. H. Ng & Kottelat, 1998 (Cave sheatfish)

Pterocryptis cochinchinensis (Valenciennes, 1840)

Pterocryptis crenula H. H. Ng & Freyhof, 2001

Pterocryptis furnessi (Fowler, 1905)

Pterocryptis gangelica Peters, 1861

Pterocryptis indica (Datta, Barman & Jayaram, 1987)

Pterocryptis inusitata H. H. Ng, 1999

Pterocryptis neglecta (Endruweit, 2025)

Pterocryptis subrisa Ng, Lalramliana & Lalronunga, 2018

Pterocryptis taytayensis (Herre, 1924)

Pterocryptis verecunda H. H. Ng & Freyhof, 2001

Pterocryptis vorax Ng, Kahar & Tan, 2025

Pterocryptis wynaadensis (Day, 1873)

Synonyms

Pterocryptis torrentis (Kobayakawa, 1989); valid as P. berdmorei

Genomics

A near telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of Pterocryptis cochinchinensis was published in 2026, representing a high-quality reference genome for the genus. The genome is approximately 931.7 Mb in size, assembled into 28 chromosomes, with a BUSCO completeness of 96.7%, and 28,079 protein-coding genes functionally annotated.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Pterocryptis” as genus of fishes. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1934, 2006, 1860, 1937—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Pterocryptis, genus and fishes can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as genus of fishes. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3759696. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1934, 2006, 1860 and 1937.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pterocryptis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pterocryptis primary sources, Pterocryptis archive and Pterocryptis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pterocryptis”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Pterocryptis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.