CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Anagyrus lopezi

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 24, 2025
Entity authorityQ13368944 ↗
Source-derived summary

Anagyrus lopezi is a species of parasitic wasp native to Central America. It is used as biological control agent against the cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti).

Large-scale deployment of this parasitoid was done in Africa and was successfully achieved in Thailand and several other Southeast Asian countries in 2010.

In 2010, a large number of wasps were airdropped into Thailand to control mealy bug.

In 1980, wasps were used to control mealy bug in cassava fields of west Africa and reduce the pest population by 80–90%.

External links

"African wasps let loose to save cassava". Bangkok Post.

Editorial summary

“Anagyrus lopezi” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Anagyrus, lopezi and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 1980—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Anagyrus, lopezi and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Anagyrus lopezi” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Anagyrus, lopezi and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 24, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q13368944. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010 and 1980.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anagyrus lopezi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anagyrus lopezi primary sources, Anagyrus lopezi archive and Anagyrus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anagyrus lopezi”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Anagyrus lopezi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.