CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Anzor Chikhladze

Russian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 8, 2024
Entity authorityQ4778470 ↗
Source-derived summary

Anzor Irakliyevich Chikhladze (Russian: Анзор Ираклиевич Чихладзе; born 18 August 1949) is a Russian professional football coach and a former player.

Club career

He played 6 seasons in the Soviet Top League for FC Torpedo Kutaisi, FC SKA Rostov-on-Don and FC Shakhtar Donetsk.

Editorial summary

“Anzor Chikhladze” enters the record as russian footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Anzor, Chikhladze and Russian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1949—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1949-08-18. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Anzor, Chikhladze and Russian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Anzor Chikhladze” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Anzor, Chikhladze and Russian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 8, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q4778470. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1949.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anzor Chikhladze”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anzor Chikhladze primary sources, Anzor Chikhladze archive and Anzor research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anzor Chikhladze”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Anzor Chikhladze” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.