CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Antônio Jacó da Paixão

Brazilian lawyer, founding father

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ30938034 ↗
Source-derived summary

Antonio Jacó da Paixão (28 November 1842 — 26 September 1912) was a Brazilian politician and signatory of the Brazilian Constitution of 1891.

A lawyer, he graduated from the Legal and Social Sciences university of São Paulo (Now the Law School of the University of São Paulo) in 1875.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Antônio Jacó da Paixão” as brazilian lawyer, founding father. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1842, 1912, 1891, 1875—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1842-11-28. The account is most persuasive where Antônio, Jacó and Paixão can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as brazilian lawyer, founding father. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q30938034. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1842, 1912, 1891 and 1875.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Antônio Jacó da Paixão”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Antônio Jacó da Paixão primary sources, Antônio Jacó da Paixão archive and Antônio research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Antônio Jacó da Paixão”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Antônio Jacó da Paixão” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.