CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

António Rodrigues

Portuguese athletics competitor (1905–1994)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 18, 2025
Entity authorityQ9158197 ↗
Source-derived summary

António Rodrigues (29 October 1905 – 17 July 1994) was a Portuguese sprinter. He competed in the men's 100 metres at the 1932 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “António Rodrigues” as portuguese athletics competitor (1905–1994). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around António, Rodrigues and Portuguese.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1905, 1994, 1932—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1905-10-29, 1905-10-27—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with António, Rodrigues and Portuguese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “António Rodrigues”, the useful work is to connect “portuguese athletics competitor (1905–1994)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q9158197. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1905, 1994 and 1932.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “António Rodrigues”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow António Rodrigues primary sources, António Rodrigues archive and António research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “António Rodrigues”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “António Rodrigues” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.