Antonio Chłapowski
Polish sportsperson
Antonio/Antoni Chłapowski (born December 31, 1943, in Lwów, Poland) is a sportsperson.
He is a descendant of Dezydery Chłapowski. Chłapowski has both Polish and Swedish citizenship.
Formula Ford career
Chłapowski's was the first sport was Formula Ford. He won the Danish championship, and came second in the Swedish championship and the championship of the Benelux countries. Antonio also qualified to second place in the final of the 1972 World Championships.
Some of the Swedish competition results in Formula Ford
Equestrian career
Eventually Chłapowski gave up his auto racing career to move to horses. Upon Chłapowski's graduation from the renowned Swedish education for Riding instructors at Strömsholm he received the highest instructor level, RIK III.
Chłapowski continued his sports career as a member of the Swedish equestrian team. For many years he competed against and trained with riders like Jan Mathausen, Thomas and Markus Fuchs, Wilhelm Melliger, Stanny van Paesschen and Helen and Peter Weinberg. Chłapowski is now an outstanding coach and also a professional farrier.
The public source identifies “Antonio Chłapowski” as polish sportsperson. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Antonio, Chłapowski and Polish.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Antonio Chłapowski”, the useful work is to connect “polish sportsperson” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 5, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q19911752. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1943 and 1972.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Antonio Chłapowski”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Antonio Chłapowski primary sources, Antonio Chłapowski archive and Antonio research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Antonio Chłapowski”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Antonio Chłapowski” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.