CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Antonio Vallisneri

Italian scientist (1661-1730)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ2662898 ↗
Source-derived summary

Antonio Vallisneri (3 May 1661 – 18 January 1730), also rendered as Antonio Vallisnieri, was an Italian medical scientist, physician and naturalist. He played a significant role in the early history of both biology and anatomy. Vallisneri is regarded as one of the fathers of modern geology and his work was highly valued by Charles Lyell.

Life

Early life and education

Vallisneri was born at Trassilico in the duchy of Modena on 3 May 1661. His father, Lorenzo Vallisneri, a doctor of laws, was governor of the district of Garfagnana; his mother was Maria Lucrezia Dacini. A grand-uncle was the physician Cesare Magati. After preliminary schooling in Scandiano, Modena, and Reggio, in 1682 he went to Bologna, where he studied medicine under the guidance of Marcello Malpighi. In 1683, Vallisneri was elected prior of the students at Bologna. He remained there through 1684, gaining practical experience under the guidance of Paolo Salani, whom Malpighi, since he was himself seeing few if any patients, recommended as a suitable mentor. It is remarkable that although Vallisneri admired the learning of Malpighi's adversary, Giovanni Girolamo Sbaraglia, whose lectures he often attended, his relations with Malpighi remained most cordial, his attitude reverential.

Editorial summary

“Antonio Vallisneri” enters the record as italian scientist (1661-1730). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Antonio, Vallisneri and Italian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1661, 1730, 1682, 1683—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1661-05-03. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Antonio, Vallisneri and Italian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Antonio Vallisneri” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Antonio, Vallisneri and Italian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2662898. VIAF identifies the subject as 54168259. The Library of Congress control number is n82222520. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1661, 1730, 1682 and 1683.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Antonio Vallisneri”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Antonio Vallisneri primary sources, Antonio Vallisneri archive and Antonio research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Antonio Vallisneri”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Antonio Vallisneri” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.