CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Anton Kicha

Ukrainian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 2, 2024
Entity authorityQ18634425 ↗
Source-derived summary

Anton Kicha (Ukrainian: Антон Владиславович Кіча; born 1 May 1990) is a Ukrainian professional footballer who plays as a midfielder for Metalurh Zaporizhzhia.

Career

Kicha is a product of two Dnipropetrovsk youth sportive schools. His first trainer was Anatoliy Zyuz.

He made his debut in the Ukrainian Premier League entering as the second-time substitute for FC Illichivets Mariupol in the game against FC Vorskla Poltava on 17 July 2010.

Editorial summary

“Anton Kicha” enters the record as ukrainian footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Anton, Kicha and Ukrainian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1990, 2010—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1990-05-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Anton, Kicha and Ukrainian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Anton Kicha” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Anton, Kicha and Ukrainian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 2, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q18634425. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1990 and 2010.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anton Kicha”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anton Kicha primary sources, Anton Kicha archive and Anton research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anton Kicha”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Anton Kicha” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.