Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy
French missionary and saint (1818-1866)

Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy (16 March 1818 – 30 March 1866) was a French missionary and saint. His feast day is March 30, and he is also venerated along with the rest of the 103 Korean martyrs on September 20.
Biography
Antoine Daveluy was born 16 March 1818 in Amiens, France. His father was a factory owner, town councilman, and government official. The members of his family were devout Catholics and two of his brothers became priests. He entered the St. Sulpice Seminary in Issy-les-Moulineaux himself in October 1834 and was ordained a priest on 18 December 1841.
His first assignment was as an assistant priest in Roye. Despite poor health, he joined the Paris Foreign Missions Society on 4 October 1843. He departed for East Asia on 6 February 1844, intending to serve as a missionary in the Ryukyu Islands of Japan.
The public source identifies “Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy” as french missionary and saint (1818-1866). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Marie-Nicolas-Antoine, Daveluy and French.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy”, the useful work is to connect “french missionary and saint (1818-1866)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 30, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1044901. VIAF identifies the subject as 12297314. The Library of Congress control number is n2007008820. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1818, 1866, 1834 and 1841.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy primary sources, Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy archive and Marie-Nicolas-Antoine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.