CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Split-quaternion

4-dimensional associative algebra over the reals

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ2996919
Source-derived summary

In abstract algebra, the split-quaternions or coquaternions form an algebraic structure introduced by James Cockle in 1849 under the latter name. They form an associative algebra of dimension four over the real numbers.

After introduction in the 20th century of coordinate-free definitions of rings and algebras, it was proved that the algebra of split-quaternions is isomorphic to the ring of the 2×2 real matrices. So the study of split-quaternions can be reduced to the study of real matrices, and this may explain why there are few mentions of split-quaternions in the mathematical literature of the 20th and 21st centuries. The split-quaternions are also equivalent to the Clifford algebras Cl2,0(R) ≅ Cl1,1(R) over the real numbers, and so the study of split-quaternions is also subsumed in the study of Clifford algebra and geometric algebra in the mathematics and physics literature.

Definition

The split-quaternions are the linear combinations (with real coefficients) of four basis elements 1, i, j, k that satisfy the following product rules:

i2 = −1,

j2 = 1,

k2 = 1,

ij = k = −ji.

By associativity, these relations imply

jk = −i = −kj,

ki = j = −ik,

and also ijk = 1.

So, the split-quaternions form a real vector space of dimension four with {1, i, j, k} as a basis. They form also a noncommutative ring, by extending the above product rules by distributivity to all split-quaternions.

The square matrices

1

=

(

1

0

0

1

)

,

i

=

(

0

1

1

0

)

,

j

=

(

0

1

1

0

)

,

k

=

(

1

0

0

1

)

.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Split-quaternion” as 4-dimensional associative algebra over the reals. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Split-quaternion, 4-dimensional and associative.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1849—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Split-quaternion, 4-dimensional and associative providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Split-quaternion”, the useful work is to connect “4-dimensional associative algebra over the reals” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2996919. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1849.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Split-quaternion”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Split-quaternion primary sources, Split-quaternion archive and Split-quaternion research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Split-quaternion”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Split-quaternion” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.