CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Antibiotice Iași

company

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ574884 ↗
Source-derived summary

Antibiotice Iași is a public pharmaceutical company which is one of the largest drug producing company in Romania. It is 53.02%-owned by the Romanian Ministry of Health. Its research center and production facilities are based in Valea Lupului, a commune near Iași.

Antibiotice produces 150 medicines for human use from 12 therapeutic areas, veterinary medicines, and active substances (Nystatin). Its products are exported to various countries, including the United Kingdom, United States, Hungary, Lithuania, Iraq, Yemen or Vietnam.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Antibiotice Iași” is company. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Antibiotice, Iași and company, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 78-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1955. For this dossier, Antibiotice, Iași and company is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “company” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q574884. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Antibiotice Iași”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Antibiotice Iași primary sources, Antibiotice Iași archive and Antibiotice research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Antibiotice Iași”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Antibiotice Iași” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.