CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Bredt's rule

Empirical observation that states that a double bond cannot be placed at the bridgehead of a bridged ring system

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ900838 ↗
Source-derived summary

In organic chemistry, Bredt's rule is the empirical observation that bridged molecules tend only to possess a double bond at the bridgehead in large ring systems. The rule is named after Julius Bredt, who first discussed it in 1902 and codified it in 1924.

An anti-Bredt molecule is a moecule which does not follow Bredt's rule. For example, two of the following norbornene isomers violate Bredt's rule and are too unstable to prepare:

Causes and consequences

Bredt's rule results from geometric strain: a double bond at a bridgehead atom necessarily must be trans in at least one ring. For small rings (fewer than eight atoms), a trans alkene cannot be achieved without substantial angle and ring and angle strain (the p orbitals are improperly aligned for a π bond through twisting and pyramidalization). Bredt's rule also applies to carbocations and, to a lesser degree, free radicals, because these intermediates also prefer a planar geometry with 120° angles and sp2 hybridization. It generally does not apply to hypervalent heteroatoms, although they are commonly written with a formal double bond.

Bredt's rule can predict the viability of competing elimination reactions in a bridged system. For example, the metal alkyl complexes usually decompose quickly via beta elimination, but Bredt strain prevents tetranorbornyl complexes from doing so. Bicyclo[5.3.1]undecane-11-one-1-carboxylic acid undergoes decarboxylation on heating to 132 °C, but the similar compound bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-7-one-1-carboxylic acid remains stable beyond 500 °C, because the decarboxylation proceeds through an anti-Bredt enol.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Bredt's rule” as empirical observation that states that a double bond cannot be placed at the bridgehead of a bridged ring system. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Bredt's, rule and Empirical.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1902, 1924—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Bredt's, rule and Empirical providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Bredt's rule”, the useful work is to connect “empirical observation that states that a double bond cannot be placed at the bridgehead of a bridged ring system” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q900838. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1902 and 1924.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bredt's rule”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bredt's rule primary sources, Bredt's rule archive and Bredt's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bredt's rule”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Bredt's rule” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.