CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Anthropomancy

method of divination by the entrails of dead or dying men or women through sacrifice

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 29, 2025
Entity authorityQ1750245
Source-derived summary

Anthropomancy (from Greek anthropos (ἄνθρωπος, man) and manteia (μαντεία, divination)) is a method of divination by the entrails of dead or dying men or women through sacrifice. This practice was sometimes also called splanchnomancy. In ancient Etruria and Rome, the usual variety of divination from entrails was haruspicy (performed by a haruspex), in which the sacrifice was an animal.

Practitioners in fiction

"Clyde Bruckman's Final Repose", an episode of The X-Files

Nasus, the Curator of the Sands, League of Legends

Darken Rahl

Creatures of Light and Darkness

Ninth House

Voice Like a Hyacinth

References

Shepard, Leslie A. (1991). Encyclopedia of Occultism & Parapsychology (3rd ed.). Detroit: Gale Research Inc. ISBN 0810349078.

Editorial summary

“Anthropomancy” enters the record as method of divination by the entrails of dead or dying men or women through sacrifice. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Anthropomancy, method and divination can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1991—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Anthropomancy, method and divination.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Anthropomancy” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Anthropomancy, method and divination provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1750245. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1991.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anthropomancy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anthropomancy primary sources, Anthropomancy archive and Anthropomancy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anthropomancy”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Anthropomancy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.