CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Phaeoceros carolinianus

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 6, 2025
Entity authorityQ17295327 ↗
Source-derived summary

Phaeoceros carolinianus is a species of hornwort—a group of simple, non-vascular plants—that is found worldwide in damp, shaded areas. It forms flat, dark green, rosette-shaped patches measuring 10–20 mm in diameter on bare soil and rock surfaces. The plant is characterised by its horn-like spore capsules, which grow 40–60 mm tall, and for producing both male and female reproductive structures on the same plant (a monoicous condition). These features, along with its unique spore structure, distinguish it from closely related species like P. laevis.

First described by the French botanist André Michaux in 1803 from specimens collected in the Carolinas, Phaeoceros carolinianus has a complex taxonomic history and was later assigned to the genus Phaeoceros by Johannes Max Proskauer in 1951. While it often behaves as an annual plant in temporary habitats such as arable fields, it can persist longer in continuously moist environments and survive dry periods by forming tuber-like structures. The species is not only important ecologically but has also been developed as a model organism for genetic research due to its simple morphology and ease of cultivation.

Systematics

Historical taxonomy

The genus Phaeoceros, which was erected by Johannes Max Proskauer in 1951 and currently includes about 40 accepted species, is characterised by solid, smooth thalli, antheridial chambers typically containing 1–8 antheridia, and capsules without a distinct line of dehiscence.

The French botanist André Michaux first described the species in 1803 from Carolinas specimens, originally naming it Anthoceros carolinianus. Several previously described species have since been recognised as synonyms, including Anthoceros australiae, A. brotheri, A. communis, and A. multicapsulus.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Phaeoceros carolinianus” is species of plant. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Phaeoceros, carolinianus and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1803, 1951—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Phaeoceros, carolinianus and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of plant” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 6, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q17295327. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1803 and 1951.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Phaeoceros carolinianus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Phaeoceros carolinianus primary sources, Phaeoceros carolinianus archive and Phaeoceros research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Phaeoceros carolinianus”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Phaeoceros carolinianus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.