CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Unioninae

subfamily of molluscs

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 7, 2025
Entity authorityQ33139707
Source-derived summary

Unioninae is a subfamily of freshwater mussels in the family Unionidae. This superfamily has a wide distribution, being found throughout Eurasia, North America (including Central America) and Africa.

Systematics

The following classification is based on MolluscaBase and the MUSSEL Project database:

Tribe Anodontini Rafinesque, 1820

Genus Alasmidonta Say, 1818

Genus Anodonta Lamarck, 1799

Genus Anodontoides C. T. Simpson, 1898

Genus Arcidens C. T. Simpson, 1900

Genus †Cyclanodonta Starobogatov, 1970

Genus Lasmigona Rafinesque, 1831

Genus †Modelliella Starobogatov, 1970

Genus Pegias C. T. Simpson, 1900

Genus Pseudanodonta Bourguignat, 1877

Genus Pseudodontoideus Frierson, 1927

Genus Pyganodon Crosse & P. Fischer, 1894

Genus †Sichuanoconcha X.-Z. Liu, 1984

Genus Simpsonaias Frierson, 1914

Genus Simpsonella Cockerell, 1903

Genus Strophitus Rafinesque, 1820

Genus Utterbackia F. C. Baker, 1927

Genus Utterbackiana Frierson, 1927

Tribe Cristariini Lopes-Lima, Bogan & Froufe, 2017

Genus Amuranodonta Moskvicheva, 1973

Genus Anemina F. Haas, 1969

Genus Beringiana Starobogatov in Zatravkin, 1983

Genus Buldowskia Moskvicheva, 1973

Genus Cristaria Schumacher, 1817

Genus Pletholophus C. T. Simpson, 1900

Genus Sinanodonta Modell, 1945

Tribe Lanceolariini Froufe, Lopes-Lima & Bogan, 2017

Genus Lanceolaria Conrad, 1853

Tribe Lepidodesmini Huang & Wu in Huang et al. 2019

Genus Lepidodesma C. T. Simpson, 1896

Tribe Middendorffinaiini Lopes-Lima, Bolotov & Bogan, 2020

Genus Middendorffinaia Moskvicheva & Starobogatov, 1973

Tribe Nodulariini Starobogatov & Zatravkin, 1987

Genus Cuneopsis C. T. Simpson, 1900

Genus Inversiunio Habe, 1991

Genus Nodularia Conrad, 1853

Genus Pseudocuneopsis X. Huang, Y. Dai, Z. Chen & X. Wu, 2022

Genus Schistodesmus C. T. Simpson, 1900

Genus Tchangsinaia Starobogatov, 1970

Tribe Unionini Rafinesque, 1820

Genus Aculamprotula X.-P. Wu, Y.-L. Liang, H.-Z. Wang & S. Ouyang, 1999

Genus Acuticosta C. T. Simpson, 1900

Genus †Betekeia Starobogatov, 1970

Genus Diaurora Cockerell, 1903

Genus †Heterunio Lindholm, 1932

Genus †Modellinaia Starobogatov, 1970

Genus †Palindonaia Modell, 1950

Genus †Pristinunio Starobogatov, 1970

Genus Protunio P. Haas, 1913

Genus Pseudobaphia C. T. Simpson, 1900

Genus Rhombuniopsis F. Haas, 1920

Genus †Rumanunio Starobogatov, 1970

Genus †Sculptunio Lindholm, 1932

Genus †Sibirunio Starobogatov, 1970

Genus †Tuberunio Lindholm, 1932

Genus Unio Philipsson, 1788

The MUSSEL Project database and ITIS instead only divide the subfamily into five tribes, with Anodontini having three subtribes.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Unioninae” as subfamily of molluscs. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1820, 1818, 1799, 1898—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Unioninae, subfamily and molluscs can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as subfamily of molluscs. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q33139707. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1820, 1818, 1799 and 1898.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Unioninae”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Unioninae primary sources, Unioninae archive and Unioninae research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Unioninae”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Unioninae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.