Annual Review of Food Science and Technology
journal
The Annual Review of Food Science and Technology is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Annual Reviews (AR). It releases an annual volume of review articles relevant to the field of food science. It has been in publication since 2010. The editor is David J. McClements. As of 2023, Annual Review of Food Science and Technology is being published as open access, under the Subscribe to Open model. As of 2026, Journal Citation Reports gives the journal a 2025 impact factor of 15.4, ranking it fourth of 187 journal titles in the category "Food Science & Technology".
History
The Annual Review of Food Science and Technology was first published in 2010 by Annual Reviews (AR), a nonprofit organization whose stated mission is to synthesize knowledge "for the progress of science and the benefit of society." The journal's founding co-editors were Todd R. Klaenhammer and Michael P. Doyle. Following Klaenhammer's retirement, David J. McClements became co-editor in 2019. As of April 2021, McClements is the sole editor. Though it was initially published in print, as of 2021 it is only published electronically.
“Annual Review of Food Science and Technology” enters the record as journal. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Annual, Review and Food can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Annual Review of Food Science and Technology” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Annual, Review and Food provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q26841961. 3 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2010, 2023, 2026 and 2025.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Annual Review of Food Science and Technology”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Annual Review of Food Science and Technology primary sources, Annual Review of Food Science and Technology archive and Annual research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Annual Review of Food Science and Technology”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Annual Review of Food Science and Technology” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.